All Issues
Year: 2007  Vol. 11   Num. 4  - Oct/Dec Print:
Versão em PDF PDF in Portuguese Versão em PDFPDF in English Texto Text in Portuguese
Otorhinolaryngological Clinical Features of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
Aspectos Clnicos Otorrinolaringolgicos da Doena de Charcot-Marie-Tooth
Dorivaldo Lopes da Silva1, Francisco Xavier Palheta Neto2, Cludio Tobias Acatauass Nunes3, Ana Beatriz Tavares de Moura Brasil Matos4, Lia Tavares de Moura Brasil Matos4, Alianne Pacheco5
Key words:
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type I. Hereditary motor and sensoryneuropathy type II. HMSN type I. HMSN type II.

Introduction: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease is the most common hereditary peripheral neuropathy in humans, presenting incidence of 1: 2500 people. Aim: Review the literature about aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, with emphasis on otolaryngologycal clinical features. Casuistry and Methods: It was used as methodology consults the on line data bases such as Cochrane, LILACS, MEDLINE, OMIM e SciELO, applying the research the terms Charcot Marie Tooth disease, Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy Type I and Hereditary Motor and Sensory-Neuropathy Type II, to article published between years 1997 and 2007. Literature's review: Clinical features on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease normally begin between first and second life decade, varying accordingly with disease type, 1 or 2, and the linked genetic mutation. Classic clinical symptoms are characterized as bilateral and symmetrically progressive debility of distal muscles of extremities, mostly legs and feet, leading to a change of walking. It may cause sensorineural hearing loss. Vocal changes are not common. Final Considerations: Several aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease still continue obscure, being the otolaryngological changes are few investigated, rending difficult a premature and suitable diagnosis and treatment of this changes.


Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT) is the most common type of Hereditary Peripheral Neuropathy (1) in humans, together with Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy(2), affecting around 1 in 2,500 people(3).

Jean-Marie Charcot, Pierre Marie, and Howard Henry Tooth discovered CMT in the 19th century and it was also known as "peroneal fibular muscular atrophy"(4).

CMT affects children and adults and is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait, characterized by a progressive weakness and wasting of distal muscles, loss of leg muscle reflexes, sometimes involving arm's and reduction of distal sensibility(2,5). The severity degree depends on genetic basis of patients(2).

Its classification is always under revisions and nowadays it is divided into two electrophysiological-criterion-based groups: type 1 (demyelinating) and type 2 (axonal).

CMT1 is established by the reduction on nervous stimuli conduction velocity and nerve hypertrophy, while CMT2 conduction velocity is normal but there is axonal neuropathy (4).

The motivation for researching Charcot-Marie-tooth Disease was the observation of a daily interdisciplinary performance at the Hospital Universitrio Bettina Ferro de Souza - Universidade Federal do Par and Universidade do Estado do Par (University Hospital - Federal University and State University) involving fields as Otorhinolaryngology, Neurology, Pediatrics, Psychology, Social Service Care and Physiology, mainly when concerning assistance to patients with special needs. The reason to carry such study is to make health professionals aware of such syndrome. Although not common, it holds serious consequences for people, especially when late diagnosed.


To review the literature on different aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, with emphasis on ENT clinical symptoms.


On-Line search of data basis provided the necessary information and articles to accomplish this revision. They can be accessed at any time to be searched and updated accordingly to scientific literature output.

A list of data basis which was searched follows: Cochrane, LILACS, MEDLINE, OMIM and Scielo, applying to the research the terms Charcot Marie Tooth Disease, Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy Type I and Hereditary Motor and Sensory-Neuropathy Type II, for articles published between 1997 and 2007.


CMT Predominance

CMT is the most common genetic neuropathy accounting for 80 to 90% of cases 5). Occurrences of all CMT types range from 20 to 40 in 100,000 people worldwide(6). In Italy there were 10.8 occurrences in 100,000 people; in Japan the number was 17.5 in 100,000 people(7), and in the U.S.A. it was 42:100,000 people(5).

Clinical symptoms

CMT symptoms begin between the first and second decade of life(4), but it may vary according to types, CMT1 or CMT2, and genetic mutation associated to them(2). CMT1 is more common and often appears 10 years earlier than CMT2(8).

Classic clinical symptoms are characterized by bilateral and symmetrical progressive debility of distal muscles, mainly legs and feet, leading to a change on walking(4,9,10). As disease progresses, there is motor and sensory loss and then loss of reflexes(7). Such sensory and motor loss causes bone abnormalities such as high arch foot(11,12), shortening of the calcaneous tendon(7,12), curled toes, reduced angle of foot dorsiflexion(12,13) and kyphoscoliosis(11), and others, leading to difficulties in walking(4,8).

Comparing CMT1 and CMT2, it was observed differences on clinical symptom prevalence in both. Foot weakness and deformities and lower velocity of nervous stimuli conduction arise from CMT1(14).

Disease evolution depends on clinical conditions. Patients with CMT2 present slower and less severe evolution(6,14,16), symptom predominance on inferior members and rare involvement of superior ones(15). Nevertheless, due to uncommon gene mutations in some cases, CMT2 progresses quicker and more severely, as well as uncommon symptoms such as vocal changes and diaphragm paralysis(17,18).

Age can also be a sign of evolution and prognosis of the disease. In both CMT1 and CMT2, their early start seems to be connected to evolution and prognosis of the disease(16,17). Patients who present severe clinical symptoms are likely to be developed early CMT1. A study on patients who developed the disease before 20 years old showed that the conduction velocity of motor stimulus on the median nerve was lower, leading to a higher functional dysfunction than the patients who developed the disease later(17).

Otorhinolaryngological symptoms

Auditory Alterations on CMT

Auditory alterations caused by CMT are common(19,20), although the number of patients who are affected is uncertain(19). They present sensorineural hearing loss(20,21), in which a cochlear part can be found, but there is no common sense towards it(22,23). A study of the year 2002 showed the two parts on audiological involvement in the studied patients(24).

There was a hypothesis that hearing loss is caused by the involvement of the 8th pair of cranial nerve(20). Such hypothesis is in accordance with hearing loss due to cochlear nerve dysfunction as part of general neuropathy caused by the disease found in three patients from a gypsy family affected with CMT(20).

CMT-induced hearing loss is clinically different from general disorders found in patients with CMT. It presents good results with cochlear implantation for patients with auditory neuropathy(25).

Hearing loss by CMT is associated with mutations on PMP22, MPZ and Cx-32 genes(20,26,27,28,29). Nevertheless, mutation neither on Cx-32 nor on PMP22 genes determines deafness, as not all patients who present such mutations are deaf(20,27). Several studies show the association among some kind of mutation, transport and elimination of aminoacid on PMP22 gene with CMT(2,26,30).

Vocal Alterations on CMT

CMT presents several phenotype distinctions which are described in the literature, though genetic mutations that cause vocal alterations are not common. Vocal cords paresis might be associated to a more severe variable of the disease (18). It can also occur bilateral vocal cords paresis, although it is usually caused by diseases that affect central nervous system at first, such as hydrocephaly, Chiari malformation and meningomyelocele (5).

Genetic vocal alterations might be associated to mutation on GPAP1, Q163X, S194X, PMP22 and EGR2 genes, although information on that is non-conclusive or conflicting, and occurrences are rare (18).


In order to firstly suppose CMT, it is necessary to know patient's family background. If there is a previous background, then it is simple to assure CMT; however, patients from small families might represent sporadic cases. Important clue for CMT is long-term background of foot abnormalities such as high arch foot and others since childhood(2).

Regarding patient's background, it is important to know about signs of motor development, presence of cramps, difficulties in walking or running, shoe changes due to foot abnormality, presence of callosity and difficulty in moving toes(12).

Electrophysical and histopathological studies are necessary to diagnose and distinguish types of CMT (1 or 2)(3). CMT1 is diagnosed when there is reduction on motor stimulus conduction velocity by median nerve(3), and it is usually lower than 38m/s(2,31). Yet, CMT2 does not present reduction on that velocity, but an axonal neuropathy(6). Histopathological findings of biopsies of peripheral nerve on CMT1 present areas of alternated demyelination and remyelination, and also onion-bulb-like structures(3), which are not found in CMT2, but a chronic axonal atrophy(17).

Diagnosis by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and CT scan are useful for detecting and characterizing pathological condition of skeletal muscles. In CMT1, it might occur presence of peroneus muscles and fat infiltration in them (12), and also cranial nerve thickening, although being rare(32).

After patient is clinically, neurophysically and in some cases histopathologically classified, molecular diagnosis should be performed in order to classify the type of disease (CMT1 or CMT2), the inheritance condition (autosonal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked) and if necessary the genetic mutation that caused disease(2,23).


There is no therapy for CMT1, but ascorbic acid has been efficient when tested in mice. There are studies in the 3rd stage of randomization with such drug in patients with CMT1(34). Several devices have been tested in order to evaluate these patients' rehabilitation(35).

Expressive reversion of peripheral muscle fatigue by making use of modafinil has been under observation(36). Other studies have been carried to observe neuromuscular response from patients with CMT, as for example, with the use of mivacurium drug(37).

Deaf patients presented good results through cochlear implantation(25).


Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease is the main genetic neuropathy(2). There is still a lot to discover about it, as genetic researches are at their start. Several genetic alterations are involved in this process, by leading to different clinical evolutions that characterize its polymorphism(38) with severe symptoms(2,4,7,16,17). The more knowledge on these alterations, the better will be therapy and improvement of prognosis of patients with CMT.


1. BURNS J, OUVRIER R. Pes cavus pathogenesis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Brain. 2006, 120:E50.

2. KOVACH MJ, LIN JP, BOYADJIEV S, et al. A unique point mutation in the PMP22 gene is associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and deafness. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 64(6):1580-93.

3. ALCIN B, VATOVEC J, ZARGI M. Pure tone audiogram and speech audiometry in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Pflugers Arch. 2000, 439(3):202-3.

4. AHO TR, WALLACE RC, PITT AM, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: extensive cranial nerve involvement on CT and MR imaging. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004, 25:494-7.

5. GEMIGNANI F, MARBINI A. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT): distinctive phenotypic and genotypic features in CMT type 2. J. Neurol. Sci. 2001, 184:1-9.

6. TEUNISSEN LL, NOTERMANS NC, FRANSSEN H, et al. Disease course of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2. Arch. Neurol. 2003, 60:823-28.

7. MARTN LAM, OLIVA MA, MARTN JCM, et al. Actualidad gentica y clinica en las polineuropatias sensorimotoras hereditrias. Rev. habanera cienc. Md. 2005, 4(5).

8. NIEMANN A, RUEGG M, LA PADULA V, et al. Ganglioside-induced associated protein 1 is a regulator of the mitochondrial network: new implications for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005, 170:1067-78.

9. GALLARDO E, GARCIA A, COMBARROS O, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication: spectrum of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features in leg and foot muscles. Brain. 2006, 129:426-37.

10. NEIJENHUIS K, BEYNON A, SNIK A, VAN ENGELEN B, VAN DEN BROEK P. Auditory processing in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Otol. Neurotol. 2003, 24(6):872-7.

11. BERCIANO J, COMBARROS O. Hereditary neuropathies. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2003, 16:613-22.

12. ENGELFRIED K, VORGERD M, HAGEDORN M, HAAS G, GILLES J, EPPLEN JT, MEINS M. Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 2A: novel mutations in the mitofusin 2 gene (MFN2). BMC Medical Genetics. 2006, 7:53.

13. SAMBUUGHIN N, DE BANTEL A, MCWILLIAMS S, et al. Deafness and CMT disease associated with a novel four amino acid deletion in the PMP22 gene. Neurology. 2003, 60(3):506-8.

14. BOSELEY ME, BLOCH I, HARTNICK CJ. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 and pediatric true vocal fold paralysis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2006, 70:345-7.

15. NEWMAN CJ, WALSH M, OSULLIVAN R, et al. The characteristics of gait in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types I and II. Gait. Posture. 2006.

16. SVENSSON E, HAGER-ROSS C. Hand function in Charcot Marie Tooth: test retest reliability of some measurements. Clin. Rehabil. 2006, 20(10):896-908.

17. OMIM. Crouzon Syndrome [On line]. Disponvel em http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/dispomim.cgi?id=118220. Acessado em 25 de julho de 2007.

18. PAREYSON D,SCHENONE A, FABRIZI GM, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of long-term ascorbic acid treatment in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT-TRIAAL): The study protocol. 2006, 54(6):436-41.

19. BUTINAR D, STARR A, VATOVEC J. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials and cochlear microphonics in the HMSN family with auditory neuropathy. Pflugers Arch. 2000, 439(3):204-5.

20. VERHAGEN WI, HUYGEN PL, GABREELS-FESTEN AA. Sensorineural hearing impairment in patients with Pmp22 duplication, deletion, and frameshift mutations. Otol. Neurotol. 2005, 26(3):405-14. 21. REILLY MM, HANNA MG. Genetic neuromuscular disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Pyschiatry. 2002, 7:12-21.

22. BARISIC N, MIHATOV I. Neurophysiology and molecular genetics of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 neuropathy in Croatian children: follow-up study. Croat. Med. J. 2000, 41:303-13.

23. PAPADAKIS CE, HAJIOANNOU JK, KYRMIZAKIS DE, et al. Bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss caused by Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2003, 117(5):399-401.

24. CASASNOVAS C, BANCHS I, CORRAL J, et al. Clinical and molecular analysis of X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 in Spanish population. Clin Genet. 2006, 70(6):516-23.

25. POSTELMANS JT, STOKROOS RJ. Cochlear implantation in a patient with deafness induced by Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies). J. Laryngol. Otol. 2006, 120(6):508-10.

26. STOJKOVIC T, LATOUR P, VIET G, et al. Vocal cord and diaphragm paralysis, as clinical features of a French family with autosomal recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, associated with a new mutation in the GDAP1 gene. Neuromuscular disorders. 2004, 14:261-4.

27. CARTER GT, HAN JJ, MAYADEV A, et al. Modafinil Reduces Fatigue in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A: A Case Series. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care. 2006, 23(5):412-6.

28. SCHMITT HJ, MUNSTER T. Mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block in adult patients suffering from Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Can. J. Anaesth. 2006, 53(10):984-8.

29. KOCHANSKI A. How to assess the pathogenicity of mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and other diseases? J. Appl. Genet. 2006, 47(3):255-60.

30. BIENFAIT HM, VERHAMME C, VAN SCHAIK IN, et al. Comparison of CMT1A and CMT2: similarities and differences. J. Neurol. 2006.

31. PAREYSON D, SCAIOLI V, LAURA M. Clinical and electrophysiological aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuromolecular Med. 2006, 8(1-2):3-22.

32. COLOMER J, GOODING R, ANGELICHEVA D, et al. Clinical spectrum of CMT4C disease in patients homozygous for the p.Arg1109X mutation in SH3TC2. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2006, 16(7):449-53.

33. MEGGOUH F,BIENFAIT HM, WETERMAN MA, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease due to a de novo mutation of the RAB7. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

34. KOVACH MJ, CAMPBELL KC, HERMAN K, et al. Anticipation in a unique family with Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome and deafness: delineation of the clinical features and review of literature. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 108(4):295-303.

35. FABRIZI GM, CAVALLARO T, ANGIARI C, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2E, a disorder of the cytoskeleton. Brain. 2006.

36. DARQUENNES K, DE JONGHE P, DAEMS D, et al. Intermittent positive airway pressure by nasal mask as a treatment for respiratory insufficiency in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Acta. Clin. Belg. 2006, 61(4):176-81.

37. VINCI P,SERRAO M, PIERELLI F,et al. Lower limb manual muscle testing in the early stages of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Funct. Neurol. 2006, 21(3):159-63.

38. BIROUK N, GOUDIER R, LE GUERN E, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 with 17p11.2 duplication. Brain. 1997, 120:813-23

1. ENT Discipline Monitor at Universidade do Estado Do Par - 5th Year Student of Medical School at Universidade do Estado do Par.
2. Master Degree in ENT by Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and Doctorate Student in Neuroscience by Universidade do Estado do Par (Scientific Coordinator and Preceptor of the Medical Residence in ENT at Universidade do Estado do Par.
3. Master and Doctorate degrees in ENT - Head of ENT Discipline at UniversidadedDo Estado do Par.
4. 4th Year Student of Medical School at Universidade do Estado do Par.
5. 4th Year Student of Medical School at Universidade do Estado do Par.
6. Physician by Universidade do Estado do Par.

Universidade Do Estado Do Par / Universidade Federal do Par / Hospital Universitrio Bettina Ferro de Souza - (State University - Par / Federal University - Par / University Hospital - Brazil)

Francisco Xavier Palheta Neto
Mail Address: Travessa Baro do Triunfo, 3380, apt. 502 - Marco - CEP: 66093-050 - Belm/PA - Phone: (91) 3224-6517 / (91) 9116-0508 - Phone/Fax: (91) 3224-6517 - E-mail: Franciscopalheta@Hotmail.Com

This Article Was Submitted to SGP (Sistema De Gesto de Publicaes - Publication Management System) of R@IO on August 19th, 2007 and Approved on October 10th, 2007 at 12:59:55.



All right reserved. Prohibited the reproduction of papers
without previous authorization of FORL © 1997- 2023